In February 2023, four residents of Pari Island in Indonesia filed a lawsuit against the Swiss cement corporation Holcim over its share of responsibility for the climate crisis. At Holcim's request, preliminary procedural matters are now being clarified. In this way, Holcim is delaying a court ruling on its climate strategy and its responsibility as a carbon major, possibly by several years. HEKS/EPER will address Holcim's climate responsibility at the Group's Annual General Meeting in Zug tomorrow.
The plaintiffs’ concerns are clear. They want Holcim to quickly reduce its absolute and relative CO2 emissions, pay compensation for the climate damage they have already experienced, and contribute to the required adaptation measures. They argue that any party which, like Holcim the carbon major, contributes substantially to climate change and in so doing garners billions in profits, must also be accountable for the impacts of a climate that has been thrown out of kilter. So far, so simple.
However, rather than its accountability, Holcim prefers to discuss procedural matters in court. At the company's request, the litigation is now subject to a "limited procedure" and is focusing mainly on two questions: Is civil law the right legal recourse? And: Is there an interest worth protecting in the lawsuit brought by the plaintiffs? To the plaintiffs, the answers to these questions are clear: Only civil liability law can answer the question of whether a private company can be held accountable for climate damage partly caused by its business activities. As residents of the tiny island of Pari, where flooding is becoming ever more frequent, the plaintiffs also face an existential threat from climate change – partly caused by Holcim – and this is already the case today. A more cogent legitimate interest is virtually inconceivable.
